I love you so. ... Gone? Who will swear you wouldn't have done good to the country, that fulfillment wouldn't have done good to you. Robert Lowell "For Eugene McCarthy" (July 1968) WASHINGTON -- By August 1968, Sen. Eugene McCarthy was gone and his supporters were left to wonder how -- whether -- his fulfillment was connected to doing good to the country. When the Democratic convention nominated another Minnesotan, Hubert Humphrey -- who in 1964 won the vice presidential nomination McCarthy had craved -- McCarthy took the campaign off.
Freedom does not come easily in any democracy. The price of freedom is often measured in the distance one travels to cast his ballot. Willmar voters were concerned recently when city leaders were considering consolidating voting locations from 12 to four.
I'll say "Right on!" to Lavonne Halloran Reller for her Dec. 8 letter, critical of religion's opposition to the theory of evolution. Those who study the development of the species are just as religious as any of us. The more they study and wonder about it, the more they are convinced of the mysterious force (we call God) that has caused us to be so far advanced and less primitive than other life on earth.
Judging from the recent spate of high-profile teacher-student sex cases, you'd think America's teachers -- especially females -- are hopelessly lusting after their students. As a mother of boys and witness to the animal kingdom in which they dwell, I confess to being baffled by the attraction, but that's a subject for another day. Meanwhile, what is going on? And what does it mean in our sexualized culture that the lines seem to be increasingly blurred between what is appropriate and what is not. Forget "normal," not that anyone remembers.
WASHINGTON -- After this week's elections in Iraq, will our national debate be about what the United States should do to salvage the best outcome it can from a war policy that has been riddled with errors and miscalculations? Or will we mostly discuss how politicians should position themselves on the war? Here's a bet on the triumph of spin. Politicians, especially Dem-ocrats, will be discouraged from saying what they really believe about Iraq for fear of offending "swing voters." Slogans about "victory" and "defeatism" will be thrown around promiscuously.
As I recall, first it was the Ten Commandments, then the nativity scene on federal property. It proceeded as an objection to the mention of God in the Pledge of Allegiance and the Constitution as well as the mention of God on our coins. Now the yahoos are taking Christ out of Christmas, replacing it with "Happy holidays." As a result, a group of large retailers have adopted the request and made the switch. Christmas is the holiday celebrated by most everyone.
Almost daily of late I see or hear something really weird or off the wall from one or another leftist-thinking person. Some of what you all seem to hope for us all is really bizarre! Now after reading the Dec. 8 letter to the editor pertaining to "the hypocrisy of conservatism," I'm left scratching my head in wonderment. First comes to my mind a quote that my dear mother would have said after reading this letter.
A letter from Norm Baker in the Tribune on Dec. 8 stated that since 1945 the United States has paid the United Nations $30 billion. That is a period of 60 years. I just looked up on the Internet the current cost of the Iraq war. The figures kept changing in front of my eyes -- it was a running total. The total? $225 billion and counting! Somehow, the cost of war dwarfs the cost of trying to attain peace. The U.S. is underpaying its fair share to the U.N.
This is the season for peace on earth. This is the season for goodwill to all. This is the season to make peace. This is the season to spread goodwill. We all need peace; we all need goodwill. Only we can make peace on earth. Only we can extend goodwill to all. June Nelson, Spicer
Aspiring stateswomen have few role models on American soil. Thus, it's an invent-as-you-go process for people such as Hillary Clinton, one of only a few women in the U.S. Senate and the most likely Democratic candidate for president in 2008. Can she become the first female commander in chief? A year ago, I would have said "no" simply because she's not a woman most men -- rationally or not -- can stand.