More money, more problems

ST. PAUL - Chaos on the House floor in the minutes before Monday’s Minnesota Legislature adjournment may have been inevitable, according to lawmakers who were around in 2001, the last time there was a state budget surplus.
After more than 10 years of budget deficits, a projected nearly $2 billion surplus led to hopes of tax breaks, more money for education and repairs to the state’s roads. But when the House and Senate adjourned, some of those priorities were left on the table in an all-but-too-common messy, chaotic end of session.
What happened? Why, with a projected surplus, was it so difficult to come to a compromise on so many issues? Was it politics Republican-controlled House vs. a DFL Senate and governor? Or was it something else?
Seasoned lawmakers said it comes down to expectations.
Rep. Alice Hausman, D-St. Paul, was in her seventh term the last time the state was flush with cash. She said there are a lot of expectations coming into a session when there is a projected surplus, and that people don’t clearly understand that the number is just that: a number, not money in the bank.
“When you begin with a public perception that it is already there, all the groups come out of the woodwork,” she said.
“ ‘Give it back, you’ve collected too much taxes.’ Others say, ‘Thank goodness, now you can do more for education, health and human services.’ ”
But a February economic forecast upon which the budget is based is only a forecast. “And it was made before the Target layoffs, before the U.S. Steel and mining layoffs and before the avian flu crisis.”
The growing partisanship also could be felt with so much money in play.
Rep. Mary Murphy, D-Hermantown, said that, for her, legislating during surplus years is hard.
“Back in 2001, there wasn’t as much partisanship, in the sense that there were hopes that you could sometimes pass a bill without the lockstep approval or disapproval,” the 20-term Democrat said.
Murphy said the number of years the state has faced a deficit has taken its toll. “Keep in mind that in that other time, there weren’t as many years in a row where we had to cut, and cut, and cut. This has been 10 years of unfilled expectations.”
There’s that word again: “expectations.” And it’s not only the legislators who have a hard time reining them in.
“I suppose it’s true that it’s harder to legislate during a surplus because the groups line up like crazy and they don’t do that when there is a deficit,” said Sandy Neren, who has lobbied at the Legislature since 1978.
She concurred with Murphy that the pent-up demand leads to more pressure.
In times of deficit, she said that legislators just nod their heads and acknowledge a proposal as a “good idea,” and walk away because of lack of money. But in a surplus, the groups come back more forcefully hoping that their good idea will get funded.
Rep. Jim Knoblach, R-St. Cloud, is the money man in the House, as chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, which sets the spending targets. He, too, was here for the last surplus.
“I wouldn’t say it’s easier to legislate during a deficit, because you have a lot of difficult decisions to make and people get hurt,” Knoblach said. “But, on the other hand, both parties realize that there isn’t money, and the only question is do you raise taxes or not.
“While, when there is a surplus, the Republicans will not want to spend it all, and the Democrats most probably will. So if anything, it’s harder with a surplus.”
And so session 2015 closed out with over $1 billion left unspent.
Session Daily is a nonpartisan online publication of Minnesota House Public Information Services at www.house.leg.state.mn.us/SessionDaily .