Cindy Regan's letter: Clinton's corruption runs deep
In response to Jim Falk's ridiculous letter concerning "angry Republicans": The anger is not with Trump, but with Hillary Clinton and the Republicans who are not supporting their nominee. You say Republicans are only for the rich. But the Clinton...
In response to Jim Falk's ridiculous letter concerning "angry Republicans": The anger is not with Trump, but with Hillary Clinton and the Republicans who are not supporting their nominee.
You say Republicans are only for the rich. But the Clintons have amassed $100 million net for each of them through speeches, and funneled donations from their pay-to-play foundation into a shell corporation owned by Bill Clinton.
The depth of corruption is deep in the Obama/Clinton administration. Christopher J. Farrell is a military intelligence officer specializing in counter-intelligence, human intelligence, national security matters, unconventional warfare, and terrorism. He has extensive education, training, and experience in these areas. Him I believe when he says Hillary Clinton put this country in grave danger.
The FBI director is lying and complicit in the email scandal. Foreign intelligence would be looking for the information sent over Hillary Clinton's unsecured email server, i.e., Russia, China, Korea, the Middle East.
Top-secret SCI emails were sent across Hillary Clinton's unsecured email server. Putting the country at grave risk is the definition of compromising secret information. If anyone else did this you would see the FBI carrying cardboard boxes out of their home.
A Romanian hacker captured a screen of Sidney Blumenthal's inbox showing the clintonemail.com. (Blumenthal is a former journalist and aide to the Bill Clinton White House. He sent dozens of memos to Hillary Clinton while she served as Secretary of State; 23 contained classified information. He did not work for the government at the time, he worked for the Clinton Foundation.)
Anyone with top security clearance would automatically be polygraphed. Hillary Clinton was not. It is a yes or no question. Walk it back and that person would be prosecuted. Mishandling defense information is a violation of code of 18 U.S. Code Sec. 793 with no requirement to prove intent. The Inspector General would make the decision to prosecute, not the FBI director.
In light of this information, the obvious coercion would have to come from the top to not prosecute, namely Obama. And we should vote Democrat because?