Cal Thomas: Who(m) do you trust?

From the commentary: Public trust reached a three-decade high shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but declined quickly thereafter. Since 2007, those saying they can trust the government always or most of the time has not surpassed 30 percent.

Test tube with Corona virus name label is seen in this illustration picture
FILE PHOTO: Test tube with Corona virus name label is seen in this illustration taken on January 29, 2020.
REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/File Photo

Before he became host of "The Tonight Show" on NBC, Johnny Carson hosted a show on ABC called "Who Do You Trust?" The grammatical error aside (WHOM do you trust would have been correct), it's a question many are asking when it comes to their government, scientists and politicians. Perhaps an updated version might be whom CAN you trust?

Cal Thomas commentary
Cal Thomas Commentary
Tribune graphic
Summary: I once heard the late evangelist Rev. Billy Graham say America was not at a crossroads, but had traveled down the wrong road and needed to come back to the crossroads and take the right road. What if we can no longer agree on the right road and where the wrong road is leading us?
Summary: Donald Trump would do well to withdraw from the field and allow younger and less controversial candidates to replace him. His record of policy successes while president are undeniable (except for those in denial), but his narcissistic personality contributed to his loss. It is also contributing to the work of the January 6 committee. If that committee wishes to "bring us together," it will forgo recommendations of criminal prosecution and let voters decide, as they should and ultimately will, the future of Donald Trump.
Summary: When rhetoric gets heated, perhaps the best way to be heard is to speak in a tone Scripture attributes to God — "a still, small voice." As noted by the writer of Proverbs: "A gentle answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger. (Proverbs 15:1)
Summary: Many viewers might want to know why Congress can't seem to fix any of the country's real problems. That perennial question is why increasing numbers of Americans have grown sour about Washington. They see members of Congress more interested in re-election, in their careers and in perks than in the people they are supposed to represent.

With respect to just the latest lies about the origin, prevention and treatment for the virus that causes COVID-19, the misinformation and disinformation are now being uncovered.

The latest comes from the Department of Energy. While labeling its conclusions "low confidence," it is the first revelation from any federal agency that early allegations that the virus originated from a laboratory leak in Wuhan, China, might have credibility.

FBI Director Christopher Wray has since come out to say that the COVID pandemic was "likely caused" by the Chinese lab leak.


When the story was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, White House National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan claimed there is no "consensus" in the intelligence or scientific communities about the origin of the virus. Since when did a lack of consensus keep them from reaching conclusions? When there has been consensus, it has often been wrong (i.e. the missed Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in 1941, the Bay of Pigs invasion in 1962, the Tet Offensive in Vietnam in 1968, the Yom Kippur War in 1973, the Iranian Revolution in 1978, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. Check these and others out at .

Let's not forget those 50 retired intelligence officers who were all-in when it came to agreeing that the Hunter Biden laptop story was part of a "Russian disinformation" operation. Joining the pile-on was Hillary Clinton, who claimed then-Rep Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) was a Russian "asset." None has apologized for these lies, nor have their media enablers.

The list of misinformation and lies is long. They involved masks (good, not good), school closures (effective, ineffective), vaccines (prevent infection, then don't, but wear masks anyway), social distancing (effective, but then not so much).

There was one overwhelming consensus among the "experts" — anyone who disagreed with them was a conspiracy theorist, a denier, wore a tin hat, and was stupid and racist.

The media aided and abetted the "experts" by calling critics names to silence them. Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) was a special target. About Cotton's view the virus came from a Chinese lab, a New York Times headline read "Senator Tom Cotton Repeats Fringe Theory of Coronavirus Origin." The Washington Post ran a nearly identical headline: "Tom Cotton keeps repeating a coronavirus fringe theory that scientists have disputed." Many others agreed.

On Feb. 20, the Post published this halfhearted statement without apology: "Earlier versions of this story and its headline inaccurately characterized comments by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) regarding the origins of the coronavirus."

Then there was Dr. Anthony "I am science" Fauci who made dubious and changing claims, debunking statements from anyone who disagreed with him.

More Commentary:
From the commentary: In the administration’s rush to appease the powerful oil industry, it has once again demonstrated that no matter which party is in power, it must kowtow to corporate interests who green-wash their way to record profits at the expense of our planet’s health
From the commentary: There is a way, meanwhile, politicians can put themselves in charge: They can buy the business.
From the commentary: Parents are witnessing the fallout from these political attacks on teachers as districts resort to substitutes and larger class sizes because they can’t hire enough staff.

The New York Post has compiled a list of misinformation that came from supposedly reliable sources. They include vaccinated immunity is better than natural immunity; school closures reduced COVID transmission; the vaccine has no side effects; young people benefit from a vaccine booster; vaccine mandates increased vaccination rates, and, of course, COVID origination from the Wuhan Lab is a conspiracy theory.


The Pew Research Center has studied the trust Americans place in government: "When the National Election Study began asking about trust in government in 1958, about three-quarters of Americans trusted the federal government to do the right thing almost always or most of the time. ... Public trust reached a three-decade high shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but declined quickly thereafter. Since 2007, those saying they can trust the government always or most of the time has not surpassed 30 percent.

Is it any wonder?

This Cal Thomas commentary is his opinion. He can be reached at

Commentary logo
Commentary logo
Tribune graphic

What To Read Next
Get Local