American Opinion: Democrats should stop protecting the rich and support Romney bill

Summary: It’s the kind of compromise for the common good that used to be commonplace in Washington. Passing the Family Security Act 2.0 wouldn’t just help families and children across America; it might restore just a little bit of hope in our political system.

Mitt Romney
U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney
We are part of The Trust Project.

In a remarkable reversal of tradition, some Republicans have proposed a generous, broad-based federal benefit that Democrats are likely to oppose because it soaks the rich — their rich.

U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah, and his GOP colleagues Richard Burr of North Carolina and Steve Daines of Montana, have created what they call the Family Security Act 2.0. The bill would revive one of the best parts of President Joe Biden’s Build Back Better proposal, its permanent expansion of the child tax credit. It would provide the credit in a different and more useful form, a pure cash benefit as opposed to a credit against taxes owed.

American Opinion
American Opinion
Recent American Opinion editorials.
From American Opinion editorial: Enter the Anti-Robocall Litigation Task Force, a nationwide effort that’s being made to investigate and take legal action against companies who bring foreign robocalls into the United States. The coalition includes attorneys general from all 50 states.
From the American Opinioin editorial: Late in 2021, U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland formally created a process to replace derogatory names of geographic features across the nation. She declared the word “squaw” to be derogatory and ordered a federal panel — called the Board on Geographic Names — to move forward with procedures to remove that word from federal usage.
The truth about the lie fits perfectly with last week’s Jan. 6 hearing, which exposed that Trump’s plan all along was to urge the ginned-up, lied-to mob to train their ire, and their fire, on the U.S. Capitol.

And it would do so without costing the federal government a dime. The proposal would be completely paid for by reform of the confusing earned income tax credit (EITC) and, most importantly, repeal of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction.

The senators’ plan to pay for the benefit is inspired. The SALT deduction is a regressive giveaway to high earners in high tax jurisdictions — generally blue states and urban areas. It is beloved by Democrats as a sop to their donor class, even though it violates every other principle of taxation and good governance they claim to hold.

The plan mirrors Biden’s plan in key respects. For every child under 5, families would receive $350 per month, and for every child age 6 to 17, $250. Families would also receive $700 a month for the final four months of pregnancy.


Families must make $10,000 a year to receive the full benefit. Families under that threshold would receive a percent of the benefit equal to the percent of $10,000 they earned, such as 50% for $5,000. The benefit also begins to decrease for wealthier families.

We object to one aspect of the plan: It would exclude families with no working members. We understand the argument, expressed succinctly by populist-conservative economist and plan supporter Oren Cass, that “cash payments are the wrong way to help households disconnected from the workforce, who require concrete interventions to move from poverty toward self-sufficiency.”

But, as we have said previously, family situations are often complicated in ways that make workforce participation very difficult — not because they don’t want to work, but because they practically can’t or shouldn’t work. For instance, it’s not uncommon for poor children to live with their grandparents.

Even so, the plan would still be a major step forward. Congress should pass and the president should sign the bill. Biden would get a centerpiece of his Build Back Better plan and Republicans a major piece of pro-work family policy.

It’s the kind of compromise for the common good that used to be commonplace in Washington. Passing the Family Security Act 2.0 wouldn’t just help families and children across America; it might restore just a little bit of hope in our political system.

This American Opinion editorial is the opinion of the editorial board of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

©2022 PG Publishing Co. Visit at Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.

More opinion content
Recent opinion content published in the West Central Tribune.
"An indoor harvest meal reminded me, in this season, I feel the luckiest."
An editorial cartoon by Dave Granlund.
An editorial cartoon by Pat Bagley.
From the commentary: Biden understands what the choices are and what they involve, and after his performance of recent weeks, I trust him to make the right choice for himself, for the Democratic Party and for the country. ... But if he wants it, this much I can say: He deserves it.
From the commentary: Democrats are now saying they have done fantastically well, even better than they did when they had unified control of the federal government in the Obama years. It’s not persuasive. But it may be the best means available for them to rationalize coming down to earth.
From the editorial: So what should the GOP do? ... It is painfully obvious. Job one is to send Trump packing in some face-saving but determinative way and get behind dignified alternatives.
An editorial cartoon by Dave Granlund.
From the commentary:
"Canadian Pacific Railway wants to merge with the Kansas City Southern Railway, and that means more oil-filled trains and dangerous freight ... What if trains moved people and not dirty oil? The U.S. has the least developed passenger train system of any first world country. That’s a shame."
From the commentary: The economy matters most of all. But the return to view of some traditional issues — abortion rights and taxing the wealthy — have helped Democrats regain their mojo. They should do their best to stick with that rather than open new fights or reopen old ones.

What to read next
From the editorial: "His messages are unwavering both to criminals, that consequences will be severe, and to local authorities, that the U.S. attorney’s office is there to help."
From the editorial: If passed, the bill proposed by the Senate group would go a long way toward preventing a repeat of this fiasco of Jan. 6 insurrection.
From the editorial: Employers should keep in mind that the time and cost of recruiting new employees has more downside than keeping their good workers.