ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

American Opinion: Tentative bipartisan agreement should be the start of gun reform, not the end

Summary: If this agreement ultimately becomes law, some Republicans will undoubtedly invoke it in the future to counter valid criticism that they haven’t done enough to confront gun violence. They shouldn’t get that pass. ... This agreement doesn’t do enough, by a lot, but it’s worth pursuing for two reasons: One, at this point, anything is better than nothing. And, two, it will be an acknowledgment in principle, by at least some Republicans, that thoughts and prayers aren’t enough to confront America’s gun violence crisis. That’s a start.

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, talks with reporters following party policy luncheons on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, talks with reporters following party policy luncheons on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
(Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/TNS)<br/><br/><br/>
We are part of The Trust Project.

A tentative bipartisan agreement in the Senate on gun violence would strengthen federal background-check requirements for purchasers under 21, incentivize states to create red flag laws, prevent domestic abusers from obtaining firearms and create other reforms. If approved, these smallest of baby steps would be the most significant federal gun legislation in almost three decades — a depressing statement about the gun culture’s iron grip on Congress. But it’s a valid endeavor, as long as it goes down as the start, not the end, of gun safety reform in America.

American Opinion
American Opinion
Recent American Opinion editorials.
The Justice Department should ask Cannon to recuse herself, and if she refuses, it should appeal for reassignment of the case.
From the editorial: The right to marry whom you love should not be subject to the whims of an out-of-step conservative court or be left to a patchwork of state regulations. Congress must make the Respect for Marriage Act the law of the land.
From American Opinion editorial: Enter the Anti-Robocall Litigation Task Force, a nationwide effort that’s being made to investigate and take legal action against companies who bring foreign robocalls into the United States. The coalition includes attorneys general from all 50 states.

The pattern of dysfunction has cycled for a generation now: A mass shooting spawns demands from Americans that Congress act. Democrats offer reasonable remedies like banning assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. Republicans reject any action at all, terrified of enraging gun extremists who don’t comprise a majority of their party (or even a majority of gun owners), but can sway GOP primaries through their organization and fervency. So nothing happens and the issue sinks from public debate. Then the next mass shooting happens, and the whole process repeats itself.

That tragic pattern may yet repeat itself again in the wake of the recent back-to-back mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, and Uvalde, Texas. Democrats have an effective one-vote Senate majority, which isn’t enough to overcome an inevitable Republican filibuster of any new gun restrictions.

This time, though, there is some encouraging math in the 20-member group of senators who announced their gun-reform framework Sunday. Ten are Republicans (including longtime top gun lobby ally Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri), enough to overcome a filibuster. Which means this legislation might actually happen.

The timidity of the agreement is undeniable. Its most significant component — requiring that federal background checks on gun buyers under 21 include a search of juvenile and mental health records — will be almost meaningless in states like Missouri, where state law allows buyers to circumvent the background check system altogether by buying from a private dealer instead of a federally licensed one. A true federal universal background check law would close that loophole, and a ban on any firearms purchases by teenagers would make sense.

ADVERTISEMENT

(Missouri’s deranged new law declaring federal gun restrictions unenforceable here could theoretically complicate any such a proposal. Luckily, that brazenly unconstitutional law seems unlikely to survive its pending legal challenge.)

If this agreement ultimately becomes law, some Republicans will undoubtedly invoke it in the future to counter valid criticism that they haven’t done enough to confront gun violence. They shouldn’t get that pass. This agreement doesn’t do enough, by a lot, but it’s worth pursuing for two reasons: One, at this point, anything is better than nothing. And, two, it will be an acknowledgment in principle, by at least some Republicans, that thoughts and prayers aren’t enough to confront America’s gun violence crisis. That’s a start.

This American Opinion editorial is the opinion of the editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.

©2022 STLtoday.com . Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

______________________________________________________

This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.

More editorials:
Recent editorials of other newspapers published in the West Central Tribune.
From the editorial: Expulsion or impeachment are exceedingly rare. But Speaker Kevin McCarthy should make clear they are on the table if Rep. Santos refuses to resign.

What To Read Next
From the editorial: "There’s a lack of political checks and balances in Minnesota right now that’s far from ideal."
From the editorial: The rules are the rules. It shouldn’t be too much to expect the country’s highest leaders to start following them.
From the editorial: The days of magnanimity and bipartisan compromise are over. Some people want war and seem determined to provoke it.
From the editorial: First, public debt cannot safely be allowed to keep rising at the projected rate. Second, purporting to solve this problem by threatening to default on the country’s obligations is nuts.