ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Minnesota Opinion: House GOP fails outstate on bonding

Summary: The one solution Minnesotans have at their disposal to get their projects done would be to remove the remaining obstacles to bonding – those members of the House GOP minority who would rather vote politics than projects.

Minnesota Opinion editorial
Minnesota Opinion editorials
West Central Tribune graphic

If you’re waiting for a new water treatment plant in your small town, you’ll have to wait longer. If you’re waiting for repairs to a leaky roof at your local community college, you’ll have to wait longer.

In Mankato, if you were hoping for funding to stop the main source of drinking water from being overwhelmed by flooding on the Minnesota River, you’re up a creek without a paddle.

If you’re wondering why these projects are not happening, ask House GOP Minority Leader Kurt Daudt and your local GOP legislators who voted against bonding in a political effort to get Gov. Tim Walz to relinquish some of his constitutionally granted emergency powers.

The House vote was 75-57, six votes short of the super majority needed.

Even other Republicans in the Senate couldn’t swallow Daudt’s strategy. They mostly supported a bill that included $1.35 billion in general obligation bonds, $300 million in trunk highway bonds and $147 million in appropriation bonds, including $100 million for affordable housing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Walz detailed his numerous compromise offers to Daudt in a letter issued Tuesday. Walz noted in the letter that he was willing to relinquish some, but not all, of his emergency powers. That apparently wasn’t good enough for Daudt, who seems bent on playing out a political narrative that put politics ahead of the needs of Minnesotans.

While it’s said compromise falls to both parties, 90 percent of the blame for the bonding bill’s failure should fall to House Republicans

We challenge these representatives to make those arguments to their constituents. Bonding bills are compromises, and there will always be projects some don’t like.

Now, for the second year in a row, there is no bonding bill.

And now it appears there will be no chance for a bonding bill when the governor calls another special session because it will be at the same time other general obligation bonds are being sold. Financial experts say such actions rattle markets in the middle of a bond sale.

So Minnesotans, especially those in outstate, who have been waiting years for their projects will likely have to wait longer. And the project costs will grow.

The one solution Minnesotans have at their disposal to get their projects done would be to remove the remaining obstacles to bonding – those members of the House GOP minority who would rather vote politics than projects.

This editorial is the opinion of the editorial board of the Mankato Free Press.

Related Topics: MINNESOTA
What To Read Next
From the editorial: ... The threat of a direct superpower confrontation is looming closer to reality ...
Minnesota is well ahead of the pack in its changeover to renewable energy, but the protection of our air, water, fields and forests requires us to keep up the pressure, rather than resting on our laurels.
From the editorial: These kinds of social-issue legislative crusades, like drag shows themselves, are performative and flashy but don’t ultimately address real problems.
From the editorial: In the end, reality represents the biggest hurdle to California’s ill-thought-out EV plan.