ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Earl O. Knutson letter: What are we leaving our great-grandchildren?

The letter writer wonders what the future will be for future generations.

A coke storage area is seen as steam rises from the quench towers at the US Steel Clairton Works on Jan. 21, 2020, in Clairton, Pennsylvania.
A coke storage area is seen as steam rises from the quench towers at the US Steel Clairton Works on Jan. 21, 2020, in Clairton, Pennsylvania.
(Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)
We are part of The Trust Project.

The social cost of carbon is a mysterious economic term that pops up in discussions of climate change.

Reader Opinion: Letter to the Editor
Reader opinion letter
Kit Grode / Tribune graphic
The letter writer believe citizens should demand that our state and federal representatives and senators work on permitting the building of more coal, gas and nuclear power plants resulting in lower energy costs.
The letter writer urges caution about money solicitation requests.
The letter writer believes educators should change history lessons.

This is the definition, as seen in various places: “The social cost of carbon is an estimate of the economic costs, or damages, of emitting an additional ton of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere...”

SCC is a relatively new concept in the field of economics.

In 2018 a half-share of the Nobel Prize for economics was awarded to William Nordhaus “for integrating climate change into long-run macroeconomic analysis,” studies that he had done through some 30 years.

To estimate these costs it is necessary to look ahead 75 to 100 years, and calculations must also take into account that they are offsetting “social benefits of carbon.” It is not surprising that SCC estimates vary widely – from a few dollars to a few hundred dollars per metric ton. A working number in recent years is $51.

ADVERTISEMENT

To me, the SCC means that every gallon of gasoline I burn will add the expense my great-grandchildren and their contemporaries will have to bear throughout their lifetimes.

How much per gallon would a person have to set aside to prepay the added cost?

An internet search reveals that burning 1 gallon of gasoline forms 20 pounds of carbon dioxide, so one metric ton (2200 pounds) would be released for each 110 gallons of gasoline burned.

To prepay for future damage, using the $51 figure, 46 cents should be set aside per gallon. (At present, there is no practical way to do this.)

In the last paragraph of his Nobel acceptance speech, Nordhaus wrote “Our futures are not in the stars but in ourselves. I will not be here in 2100 to witness the results of our efforts. However, my grandchildren are likely to be here, with their children and their grandchildren. May they be looking backward with appreciation. I hope they will say that this generation had the resolve to overcome the obstacles and take the steps necessary to preserve our unique and beautiful planet.”

Earl O. Knutson
Willmar

More opinion content:
From the commentary: People who threaten to blow up an airplane if their political demands aren't met are political terrorists.
From the commentary: A policy of complete openness in most areas of information would lead to a more useful debate of national security issues and perhaps sounder policy choices.
An editorial cartoon by Dave Granlund.
From the editorial: "There’s a lack of political checks and balances in Minnesota right now that’s far from ideal."
Leadership takes honest reflection and thinking about the needs of others, Jenny Schlecht writes. With that in mind, do we have the right leaders to get a new farm bill passed by Sept. 30?
From the commentary: More than anything else, Democrats’ current harmony reflects the fact that few party members now see themselves as facing such a dilemma (back home).
From the editorial: The rules are the rules. It shouldn’t be too much to expect the country’s highest leaders to start following them.
Editorial cartoonist Kevin Siers draws on the continuing year of the gun in 2023.
The letter writer calls on the Biden administration to address Mexico's bio-tech corn ban.
From the commentary: Every day is a new embarrassment, not just for (George Santos) but for the Republicans in Congress.

What To Read Next
The letter writer wrote "Christmas is past, and the City of Willmar never put up many decorations either downtown or on First Street."
The letter writer wrote "We believe this information about the change is important to share with all the people in Kandiyohi County. We hope that the commissioners reverse their decision."
From the letter: All the excitement for legalization comes from what segment of our society? Who benefits? I’d say that the $180 million for our state coffers comes at too high a price.
The letter writer writes "please, reach out to these neighbors struggling and let them feel 'hope.' "