Rebecca West letter: The cowardly individual sent anonymous feedback

The letter writer disregards feedback from anonymous individual.

We are part of The Trust Project.

The TV program “Cheers” had a theme song that included lyric “Where everybody knows your name!” It is a comforting thought if all those “Everbodys’’ are friends. I live in a small town. My name is
published in our telephone book. My published address is not my mailing address. Sometimes I still get mail, because the post office in both small towns “Know my name.” That is usually good, but. ...

The letter writer calls for support of The National Climate Adaptation and Resilience Strategy Act.
The letter writer criticizes the idea of changing the name of Sibley State Park.
The letter writers call for collective effort to address gun violence.

After I wrote a letter to the editor published in West Central Tribune, I received a different newspaper mailed from Spicer. It cost the sender $2.65. It was sent to wrong address, wrong town, but was still delivered. I will not dignify including the name of that other newspaper.

I probably know the sender of that newspaper, but he/she was a coward and chose to remain anonymous. My friends know and usually respect that I enjoy “discussion.” My ideas don’t have to be
inflected on another “body” unless invited in open discussion — or even in answer via rebuttal of letter to the editor.

I’m willing to listen to facts, but facts based on researched truth. Only cowards anonymously refuse discussion.

The sent newspaper did not include a publication source, one of the markers I use for gauging credibility. The sender was an anonymous coward and he/she sent information that was cowardly
anonymous. I intend to add the newspaper to my compost garbage pile — the only place it can do some potential benefit.


To that newspaper sender — $2.65 was too much to invest in your cowardice.

Rececca West
New London

More opinion content:
From the commentary: It is time for our new congressional leaders to make history by bringing a new era of unity to our tired old partisan gun politics. Be it resolved: The “Party of Law-and-Order”
From the editorial: If a major presidential candidate calling for eliminating the Constitution isn’t enough to merit a preemptive, party-wide rejection of his candidacy, what is?
From the commentary: The federal government is taking in a record amount of revenue, but spending more than it receives and Democrats want to spend even more. Why is Congress deaf to the warnings of
From the editorial: "The sad reality is that busy lives roll on. ... New moments of significance occur. Those who lived through and were affected by the horribleness of significant events start
From the commentary: That is the silver lining, if there is one, of today’s bitter, culturally charged partisan warfare: It has made civic engagement more meaningful for millions of citizens,
From the commentary: r decades, the Supreme Court has been clear that stopping discrimination is more important than protecting the freedom to discriminate. The court should reaffirm this principle
From the editorial: School officials need to recognize that this may be their only chance to reverse the harms imposed by the pandemic. First, districts should gather data to determine the scale of
An editorial cartoon by Dave Granlund.
From the commentary: This much is clear. Strengthening Harris' numbers is in the administration's best political interest. The more comfortable people are with Vice President Kamala Harris, the more

What to read next
The letter writer celebrates the decade-long government effort to complete the Willmar Wye.