ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

SECOND AMENDMENT

From the editorial: At the margins, these measures may save some lives. But unless we abandon the death pact we have entered with an overly broad interpretation of the Second Amendment, mass killings will continue apace.
Summary: If Democrats show respect for the Second Amendment, compromise is possible. If they don’t, there will be no end to the slaughtering.
The justices are expected to rule by the end of this month in a challenge by two firearms owners and the New York affiliate of the National Rifle Association to that state's restrictions on carrying concealed handguns in public.
American Opinion: Jurors in Georgia, fortunately, saw through this bogus Second Amendment argument and carefully weighed the facts on their own merits. They properly concluded, at long last, that stand-your-ground authority doesn’t give gun owners a right to go on human hunting sprees.

ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Headlines
Letter writer writes in support of the Second Amendment and gun ownership.
The Republican Party is the modern-day equivalent of the medieval church. It fights science. It protects ignorance. Above all, it embraces a lunatic reading of the Second Amendment so that any nut can buy a weapon that can kill a maximum number of people in a minimum amount of time. El Paso, Dayton — at least 31 dead, many wounded, mountains of grief followed typically by the hollow oaths of politicians and the senseless redundancy of labeling an act of hate a hate crime. Oh, that'll stop the killing.
By Lawrence Hurley WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court on Monday declined to wade into the politically volatile issue of gun control by leaving intact three court rulings rejecting challenges to federal and state laws. The court's decision n...

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT